
What It Does
Serving teachers and students at once, so learning data actually flows between both sides.
Upload slides and quizzes; the system extracts the concept map and tags every question. Teachers review and adjust instead of labeling by hand.
Every alert ships with a suggested action; volume and precision are controlled to prevent alert fatigue.
Sample alerts
High priorityConcept "Visual Encoding": 58% of the class missed Q4 — three misconceptions identified; suggest revisiting in the next lecture
Student Y failed three quizzes on the concept "Chart Selection"; suggest reaching out
Heuristic questions lead students to the answer instead of giving it away; every response cites the exact slide, so answers are verifiable.
A per-concept mastery model drives question selection: weak concepts get reinforcement, strong ones get advancement.
When frustration or confusion is detected, it adjusts its approach, offers encouragement, or suggests pacing changes.
Design Principles
Practice, explanations, and encouragement are generated from each student's own mastery model and emotional state — tailored to the individual, not the class average.
It doesn't wait to be asked: weak concepts reach students before the exam, and struggling students reach teachers before problems escalate — prevention instead of firefighting.
Affect Sensing
No cameras, no biometric devices. Three compliant, low-friction signals do the job.
😣
😕
🙂
😄
A quick mood check before and after each session: the delta shows the session's effect, the trend shows the trajectory. Fully voluntary and fully visible to the student.
"I still don't understand this part…"
Distress phrasing, repeated rephrasing, and mid-problem abandonment in tutoring conversations support non-intrusive affect inference.
Abnormal answer speed, long idle gaps, and repeated retries map to confusion, frustration, boredom, and flow — the states that matter for learning.
No cameras
·
No biometrics
·
No face or voice emotion recognition
Mastery × Mood
Each quadrant routes to whoever is best placed to act — the student side adapts automatically, or the teacher is alerted with context.
High mastery
Quietly burning out
High mastery · Low mood
Emotional check-ins
Pacing adjustments
Thriving explorer
High mastery · Feeling good
Stretch challenges
Keep the flow going
Low mastery
Needs attention now
Low mastery · Low mood
Teacher proactively alerted
With full learning context
Confident beginner
Low mastery · Feeling good
Targeted practice
Fresh explanations
← Low mood
Feeling good →
Ethics & Privacy
Three principles the system is built on; the escalation path is settled with each institution before rollout.
Students see exactly what teachers can see about them; mood check-ins are voluntary and can be turned off at any time.
Teacher outreach or counseling referral — the escalation path is agreed with the institution before deployment.
Only what the features require; no biometric data, no third-party sharing.
Rollout
System built
Fully working, end to end
First pilot
One semester in a real course
More courses
Pilot evidence recruits instructors; onboarding stays light
LMS integration
Connects to campus LMS via the LTI standard
Evaluation
At the end of the pilot, these three questions decide whether it earns a place in the classroom.
Quiz-score gains on concepts the system flagged as weak.
Alert precision — whether teachers act on alerts, and how useful they rate them.
Self-reported sense of support and engagement.

Intelligent learning companion
Pilot stage — running in one real course
Sign in
·
Sign up
© 2026 KakiPal